Subject: Re: My response to Leventhal's article... From: Stephen Deach <sdeach@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 10:02:17 -0700 |
Look at the "Link and Multi Formatting Objects" Sections 4.1.6 and 4.8 At 09:19 1999-05-29 +0100, Ian Hickson wrote: >On Fri, 28 May 1999, Stephen Deach wrote: > >> Claim 2.) XSL precludes interactivity. -- No more so than CSS. > >How is the following CSS expressed in XSL? > > BUTTON { border: thin outset solid; } > BUTTON:hover { border: medium outset solid; } > BUTTON:focus { outline: dotted; } > BUTTON:active { border: medium inset solid; } > >[I ask this purely out of interest. Originally I was 'against' XSL, but >all the arguments I have heard so far have basically made me XSL-neutral: >I am in favour of XSLT, and dubious about the FOs.] > >-- >Ian Hickson >U+2642 U+2651 >U+262E U+2603 U+263A > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Stephen Deach | Sr Computer Scientist 408-536-6521 (office) | Adobe Systems Inc. 408-537-4214 (fax) | Mail Stop E15-420 sdeach@xxxxxxxxx | 345 Park Ave | San Jose, CA 95110-2704 | USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: My response to Leventhal's arti, Ian Hickson | Thread | RE: My response to Leventhal's arti, Didier PH Martin |
RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Guy Murphy |
Month |