Subject: AW: stylesheets for stylesheets (was Re: Swapping table rows and columns) From: Bernhard Keil <Bernhard.Keil@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 17:08:55 +0200 |
the way XML goes is, in my opinion, to become the Meta-Modelling-Data-Source-ROOT. To have Tools/Stylesheets to generate from a UML/XML, XML (or however) Meta-Modell Data-Source-Root to C++, Java, VB, Workflow-Man.Sys-Definition, BusinessProcess-Design-Definition, Documentation, Source-Managenent-System, and what ever is just a question of time. Bernhard Keil Diplom Physiker (Univ.) Software Engineer mailto:bernhard.keil@xxxxxx BTK Software & Consulting AG Rudolf-Diesel-Str. 5 phone: 08105-38 170 D-82205 Gilching fax: ++49(0)8105 817-60 http://www.apertum.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Oren Ben-Kiki [mailto:oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 7. Juli 1999 13:59 An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: stylesheets for stylesheets (was Re: Swapping table rows and columns) James Tauber <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I've been thinking about XSL-based literate programming on and off >for the last year or so. At various times I've considered writing FOP in XML >and having a stylesheet produce Java source from that XML. I've also toyed with similar ideas. What I really like is the ability to generate multiple documentation views from the same source file(s), something which current LP systems don't do well (if at all). For example it would be very interesting to be able to generate UML models (assuming a UML DTD)... >There was a mailing list xml-litprog-l[1] that unfortunately seems to have >gone into hibernation. > >Perhaps not surprisingly, Robin Cover has collected material on the topic at >[2]. >... >[1] http://www.ems.uq.edu.au/Public/Lists/xml-litprog-l >[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/cover/xmlLitProg.html Thanks for the references. I just spent some time going through them, and it seems that the literate programming people are well aware of XML and its advantages for them. I'm going to keep an eye on this... I have used noweb for everything in the previous company I worked in - we even wrote a backend for generating HTML and for allowing incremental tangling/weaving of large projects. I miss it sorely today - using JavaDoc just isn't the same. >I'm not aware of any effort to use XSL for literate programming, although, >as Ken has pointed out, he has used DSSSL. The documents in [2] refer to XSLT but seem to underestimate its role (prehaps due to its state at the time). It might prove possible to implement a literate programming system using just XSLT, or maybe using just a few extensions (e.g. using something like SAXON). Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: stylesheets for stylesheets (wa, Vun Kannon, David | Thread | Does XSLT need min() & max()?, Anthony B. Coates |
Re: stylesheets for stylesheets (wa, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: stylesheets for stylesheets (wa, Chris Maden |
Month |