Subject: RE: Microsoft's take on XSL From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:24:00 +0000 (GMT) |
Kay Michael writes: > > xmlns:msxsl='http://microsoft.com/XSL/Transform/1.0' > > and then use <msxsl:stylesheet>, <msxsl:template> etc if you wanted to > highlight the fact, but that's up to you. Certainly, w3c don't have a > monopoly on the "xsl" namespace prefix, only on the namespace URL. And when I do <xsl:import href="mslib/useful.xsl"/>, the application is supposed to take care of all the details? One could, theoretically, work in a mixture of the two languages? when we come to the autumn, and the W3C XSL is out, will this be the Vietnam of W3C? sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Microsoft's take on XSL, Chris Maden | Thread | Re: Microsoft's take on XSL, David Carlisle |
Re: XSL Development Tools, dcl | Date | RE: Microsoft's take on XSL, Kay Michael |
Month |