Subject: RE: EZ/X Speed: From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 13:05:18 +0000 (GMT) |
Kay Michael writes: > I haven't got many of my stylesheets to run successfully under EZ/X, most of > them are failing with an array bounds exception, but for what it's worth, I > did run the 800k dictionary sample, and it took 25 seconds with EZ/X against > 14 seconds with SAXON and about 4 seconds with xt. This was a very crude > measurement running in each case from the command line. I've they're going > to use speed as their unique selling point they've got their work cut out. EZ/X had not endeared itself to me by making me redo all my document() and xsl:import calls as fully-specified URLs; but when (just before it died saying it could not find a named template) it took: {<xsl:apply-templates select="document('plan.xml')/svg/@width"/> <xsl:text>}{</xsl:text> <xsl:apply-templates select="document('plan.xml')/svg/@height"/>} and wrote out {3194.056566<?width 3194.056566?>}{1102.158275<?height 1102.158275?>} I think I feel justified in abandoning my experiments until they have a more conformant release... "Our initial test results suggest that our XML Parser and XSL Processor are industry leading in speed and robustness" which makes me wonder what James Clark's sales pitch would look like if he ever bothered to write one! Just how does JC do it? can we buy it in a bottle? Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: EZ/X Speed:, Kay Michael | Thread | Re: EZ/X Speed:, Rick Ross |
RE: Another newbie question (from S, Kay Michael | Date | Re: Serialize DOM, Ingo Macherius |
Month |