RE: XSLT vs Omnimark

Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:19:13 +1100
At 05:22 7/03/2000, Jonathan Asbell wrote:

I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what
productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl.  Obviously we all need
the fastest method, yet one that follows standards.  Please advise
(the silent mediator)

So whose "standards" should we be following? Should there only be a single XML conversion tool/language?

Long live Omnimark, Perl, Python, ... !
The more tools the better.

J


------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread