Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:19:13 +1100 |
I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl. Obviously we all need the fastest method, yet one that follows standards. Please advise (the silent mediator)
So whose "standards" should we be following? Should there only be a single XML conversion tool/language?
Long live Omnimark, Perl, Python, ... ! The more tools the better.
------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution
http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT vs Omnimark, Rick Geimer | Thread | XSLT vs OmniMark, Steven Mielnicki |
RE: matching a substring of an elem, Mike Brown | Date | RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, James Robertson |
Month |