Subject: RE: MSXML abominations happening for a reason (was Re: MSXML...re leased) From: "Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:09:13 -0000 |
: Eileen Kinley >> Until web designers or web engineers understand the benefits of >> creating a decoupled solution with XML/XSLT they won't >clamor for fully >> functional tools. Sure, the MSXML thing is terrible, but is >anyone going >> to use it anyway? > [ek>] Is there an alternative for client-side rendering >of XML in IE? Err. Yes. I've been playing, sorry using, XSLT for a long while. I tried once to get the MS option to work. Failed, reverted to XT/Saxon. MSIE5 is my default browser. I can't figure the 'its got to be ms' logic. If I'm using XSLT then I'm probably producing HTML. If I'm producing HTML and want to view it, I use a browser. If I point my browser by mistake at an XML document, nine times out of ten it fails to show anyway, so whats the point of viewing source when the styled version is there to be checked out? Curious. DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL, XT, and ruined well-formed, Kay Michael | Thread | MSXML happening for a reason !, Dan Morrison |
Re: XSL, XT, and ruined well-formed, Duke Nickolas | Date | RE: MSXML abominations happening fo, Kay Michael |
Month |