Subject: Re: Future XSLT expansion. From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:42:01 GMT |
Didier > So, basically, the proposal is to include the node-set() function in the > next recommendation No. Paul's proposal is to add a parse-string-as-xml() function. This is essentially nothing at all like node-set() as it currently exists in xt/saxon/xalan extension namespaces. > I expect that some process structure content as > node-set and others as result tree All conforming processors treat non empty variable and parameter elements as constructing result tree fragments, and empty variable and parameter elements as constructing node sets (or other types such as boolean, string or number). MSXSL is currently experimenting with having these non empty forms construct node sets, but hopefully it will conform by the time it comes out of `preview' release. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Future XSLT expansion., Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: Future XSLT expansion., Didier PH Martin |
RE: Future XSLT expansion, Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: Future XSLT expansion, Tom Myers |
Month |