Subject: RE: ECMA script - no thanks From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 10:09:44 -0500 |
Hi, Dave said: Coming from the digest I can't reference the thread, but I would like to register concern re ECMAscript being a needed fuctionality in any further rec from w3c. I think the conclusion that this list supports any scripting language as part of a future rec is unsupported by the mail, being a response to Didiers suggestion, from one person, which in itself was ambivalent. Didier replies: So, if the group do not want ECMA script what the group wants then? I saw a thread talking about using Java as a way to extend XSLT. Is this what is wanted? Does this mean that any extension running in a browser would be in the form of an applet? Cheers Didier PH Martin ---------------------------------------------- Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com) XML Europe (http://www.gca.org) Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com) column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com) Products: http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
ECMA script - no thanks, Dave Pawson | Thread | SimpleProblem, sanjeev ramachandra |
extensions, Dave Pawson | Date | SimpleProblem, sanjeev ramachandra |
Month |