RE: position()

Subject: RE: position()
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:59:26 +0100
> then the xpath expression selects "the second occurence of C which is a
child of A", not "the
> second child of A with the condition that it is a C element".
> 
> Is this the correct behaviour?

Yes.
> 
> The only way to select the second child of A is "A/*[position()=2]"
> but in this case you can not be sure that it is a C element

Write A/*[2][self::C]

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread