Subject: Re: Dumb question from a newbie on XSLT in IE5 From: Dan Morrison <dman@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 01:22:28 +1200 |
Kay Michael wrote: > > > ok...one more dumb question guys...when we say ... > URIs used to identify namespaces are never "fetched", they are just strings. This whole thread is interesting. So although it LOOKS like a URI, it's all bogus. That string might as well say "XSLT 1.0" I chose to believe that there was some meta-language available at that source which could tell what to do with the syntax handed it. Thinking about that, it's obviously too much to ask, but I was comparing it with, say, an online DTD, which does behave that way. Does the group think this is actually the way things will move, or was this 'URI as a syntax definition' just a quick hack? .dan. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Dumb question from a newbie on , Kay Michael | Thread | Re: Dumb question from a newbie on , David Carlisle |
Sibling sort order, Richard Bell | Date | Re: xsl:if formatting problem, Phil Lanch |
Month |