Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?) From: "Khalid Asad" <asad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:19:32 -0400 |
Do you have any performance numbers comparing the difference between running the Java XSLT processor with and without compiled stylesheets? Thanks. Khalid ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Sergeant" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:06 PM Subject: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?) > On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > I used to use mod_perl. It has great performance (<20ms) but it consumes a > > huge amount of memory. Because of the memory consumption I switched to Java > > which uses almost no memory when compared to Perl but it turns out that Java > > is a lot slower. > > There are work arounds for this. See http://perl.apache.org/guide/ > > -- > <Matt/> > > Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists > Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions > Email for training and consultancy availability. > http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?), Matt Sergeant | Thread | Re: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?), Jon Smirl |
RE: xml in, xml out, DuCharme, Robert | Date | Re: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?), Jon Smirl |
Month |