Subject: Re: Is it legal to extend the xml-stylesheet DTD ? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 13:35:32 +0100 (BST) |
Sigh why don't mailing lists have the nice cancel feature of newsgroups:-) Ignore most of my previous message (except for the explanation of "pseudo") > How does it read if you speak DTD natively? A DTD can make no statements at all about processing instructions DTDs neither constrain what goes inside the tag, nor where the tag may go. As for whether your example conforms with the spec, I can't easily tell. It matches the grammar, but it it has a psuedo attribute which is not in the list of defined ones. It says the semantics come from HTML 4, and that being defined by a DTD, only allows a fixed set of attributes on the <link> element, so I would guess that your example is not legal. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Is it legal to extend the xml-s, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Is it legal to extend the xml-s, Dan Morrison |
Is it legal to extend the xml-style, Dan Morrison | Date | RE: Is it legal to extend the xml-s, Kay Michael |
Month |