Subject: RE: Donating RenderX to FOP From: "DuCharme, Robert" <Robert.DuCharme@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:11:50 -0400 |
>Even then I shall never let abuse my code by hacking it in the way FOP is >currently being written. Independent of level of spareness of time developers >dedicate to a product, it is absolutely unacceptable to write programs in such >an inaccurate way. Could you give us a really specific example of what they're doing wrong? I haven't looked through the code myself, and I'm curious. I'm not talking about a discussion of general principles, the extent of their support of the spec, or their success with RenderX's test suite; I would like to see examples of the code that inspired these remarks. thanks, Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@ snee.com> "The elements be kind to thee, and make thy spirits all of comfort!" Anthony and Cleopatra, III ii XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Outputing an '&' from XSL, Warren Hedley | Thread | testing for existence of variables?, Matthew Haughey |
Re: How is this part of the XSLT sp, Warren Hedley | Date | testing for existence of variables?, Matthew Haughey |
Month |