RE: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?

Subject: RE: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 12:37:41 +0200
> > can't you put structured comments into an element in an extension
> > namespace, so long as you provide an empty fallback?
> 
> Yes you can, but it seems convoluted to me (and some XSLT 0.9 
> processors
> don't support this mechanism). It strikes me that if 
> processing instructions
> are useful for anything, they should be useful for this.

Interesting.  What exactly do you have in mind?  Embedding <?...?> within templates, or so?

-- 
  Thorbjørn


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread