Subject: RE: Saxon VS XT From: "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo.gaspar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 17:37:18 +0200 |
An very simple hash table is implemented in the previous version of the "XSL ISAPI Filter" from Microsoft. It is used by a simple XSLT cache. It is C++ but very easy to convert to anything else (it is so tiny). Maybe it is still present in the "XSL ISAPI Filter 2.0". I am not sure (no time to check today) but you can download it and check it from this huge URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?URL=/code/sample.asp?url=/ms dn-files/027/000/552/msdncompositedoc.xml Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joshua Allen > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 07:45 > To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: RE: Saxon VS XT > > > > not necessary and hashes are difficult in C? I haven't done > > keys in xslt but I can see that they are usefull and in C > > I agree 100%. Some languages provide built-in hashing. > However, it is not hard to write your own, and usually > is the way to get best performance for a particular problem. > > Cheers, > -J > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Saxon VS XT, Joshua Allen | Thread | RE: Saxon VS XT, Thorbjørn Ravn Ander |
RE: xslt question, T S, Sivakumar | Date | RE: key(). ( Re: Saxon VS XT ), Paulo Gaspar |
Month |