Subject: Re: AW: [xsl] Template priority From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:43:33 GMT |
you are using xsl:import so important precidence is considered before priority. which means that your match for * has hight import precedence and overides everything. You could use xsl:include instead. It's not clear why you are repeating the rule for * @* and text() which look to be the same as the default rule. By repeating them you are just moving them up th eimport tree, with the effect you observe, so you could delete th etemplate for *, i think. Or if you want to keep things as they are (because your real situation is more complicated) look into using apply-imports rather than apply-templates so that templates in imported files get a chance. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
AW: [xsl] Template priority, Heinz R., ITS P E320 | Thread | [xsl] Dynamic sort order.., Ian Sparks |
AW: [xsl] Template priority, Heinz R., ITS P E320 | Date | Re: [xsl] Problem to place data int, Jeni Tennison |
Month |