Subject: Re: [xsl] Status of FOP From: AndrewWatt2000@xxxxxxx Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 05:08:00 EST |
In a message dated 25/12/00 01:18:55 GMT Standard Time, grig@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > To avoid marketing tricks and biased statements, the best thing would be an > independent review of XSL FO processors. It would be interesting to see. Does anyone know of one? Andrew Watt XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: xsl:with-param issue., Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Status of FOP, Arved Sandstrom |
[xsl] Re: xsl:with-param issue., Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] performance of copying al, Evyatar_Kafkafi |
Month |