RE: [xsl] Carrying Namespaces through a XSL to XSL Transformation

[Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>]

Evan Lenz:
> (Incidentally, I seem to
> remember finding that the node-set solution was extremely 
> slower, when using
> SAXON and a large stylesheet, than serializing, parsing, and 
> doing another
> transformation, but that's another issue, particularly 
> interesting with
> regard to v1.1 eliminating the need for the node-set function
> altogether--maybe Mike Kay can address this, but I continue 
> to digress...)

I would expect that using node-set() would be significantly faster in most
cases, but it will also use more memory, so if it causes virtual memory
thrashing, it could become slower.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list