Re: [xsl] xsl:key and document()

Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:key and document()
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:50:08 GMT
> storing the base doc tree in a variable seems a bit hack-y and
> inefficient.

why should it be inefficient? (You are not storing the whole tree in the
variable, just the root node)

Getting back to that root node is a rather different problem from the
one that Jeni was refering to which is getting the URI of that node.
XSLT specifies that every node has a URI (even if it is somewhat
artificial for constructed documents) it just doesn't let you know what
that URI is.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread