Subject: Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with the attribute From: Oliver Becker <obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:49:23 +0100 (MET) |
> I find it is more succinct to say: "Nodes from the attribute and namespace > axes are always in an arbitrary implementation-defined order, while nodes > from all other axes are in proximity order within location step expressions > and in document order in location path expressions." Although nobody asked, just a little add-on: (for the faq?) Nodes from different documents are also in an arbitrary implementation-defined order. <xsl:for-each select="document('doc1.xml')//* | document('doc2.xml')//*"> ... </xsl:for-each> Regards, Oliver /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | \-------------------------------------------------------------------/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] [ANN] XSLTDoc Beta, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] template pattern does not, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with, Jeni Tennison |
Month |