Subject: Re: [xsl] New nntp news group for xsl-fo discussion From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:45:03 GMT |
> Since the Mulberry XSL list is so overwhelmingly for XSLT it seems to me > that a place specifically for XSL-FO was needed anyway. This seems to be a dubious argument. There's more XSLT than FO on here at the moment because T has been a recommendation for ages and FO isn't a recommendation yet. Also there is already an FO list on egroups I believe. That's not to say another list/newsgroup is necessarily a bad thing, just that that particular argument isn't justification for it. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] New nntp news group for x, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] New nntp news group for x, Randall Parker |
RE: [xsl] Regex string function que, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] problem in xml parsing, Michael Kay |
Month |