Subject: RE: [xsl] Regex string function question From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:53:54 -0000 |
> Why won't us put a prosal for a standardised [regexp] extension ? > Doing an extension function that tests whether a string matches a regexp is very easy, once you've found a definition of "regular expression" that everyone can agree on. An extension function that uses a regexp to extract parts of a string is much trickier. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Regex string function que, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | RE: [xsl] Regex string function que, Rick Anderson |
RE: [xsl] problem in xml parsing, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Getting the deepest node and , Iresh Mehta |
Month |