Subject: Re: [xsl] New nntp news group for xsl-fo discussion From: Martin Stricker <shugal@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 01:12:14 +0100 |
Max Dunn wrote: > It would be interesting to see how many participants actually use FO > at all. I do. :-) Apache's fop, to be exactly. They have a good mailing list, but it covers fop-specific topics most. I'm missing a general XSL-FO list where I can discuss the language itself! > There is definitely a subset of "XSL" users who are interested in > only the transformation part, and there is also a subset that are > more focused on (and/or more eager to receive e-mails on an instant > basis about) FO. I'm interested in both XSL-T and XSL-FO. But I definitely like them to be separated from each other, meaning two mailing lists instead of one. > I would think it best if Mullberrytech either changes this to cover > just XSLT (referring FO to the eGroups site) or starts an FO list. Basically the egroups XSL-FO list does the trick, but I would feel more comfortable with another host than egroups with their limitations. Mulberrytech has proven themselves a trustworthy host, I would happily join a XSL-FO list here and end the egroups one. Best regards, Martin Stricker XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] New nntp news group for x, Max Dunn | Thread | Re: [xsl] New nntp news group for x, Randall Parker |
Re: [xsl] Linebreaks in TOC, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | [xsl] Special character "ß" in xsl-, Sven Kohl |
Month |