<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: [xsl] Quasi-Literals and XML

Subject: RE: [xsl] Quasi-Literals and XML
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:35:16 -0000
> My point is that in the first place the statement that XSL is not
> Turing-complete is debatable

It's not debatable, it's a lie, thanks for drawing it to our attention.

But presumably xmlhack isn't a peer-reviewed journal, so anyone with a
product to peddle can say what they like.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: [xsl] Quasi-Literals and XML, Linda van den Brink Thread Re: [xsl] Quasi-Literals and XML, Eric van der Vlist
Re: [xsl] recursion questions, by way of B. Tommie Date RE: [xsl] Removing Nulls, Michael Kay
Month