Subject: RE: [xsl] immediately preceding:: / following:: From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:25:32 -0000 |
> I have my <NodeID> elements already sorted. > I am testing whether or not there are duplicate NodeIDs. > If there are, I need to only include one of them. > preceding:: or following:: would work. > This works fine for small files, but the order is N^N. > Could someone please give me some performance tips? > > I am using the following lines: > <xsl:if test = "NodeID[not(.=preceding::NodeID)]"> > ... > </xsl:if> > Try "NodeID[not(.=preceding::NodeID[1])]" Most processors should optimise that so they only look at the immediately preceding node. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] immediately preceding:: /, Keith | Thread | [xsl] A really easy (hopefully) que, Chris Gow |
RE: [xsl] How to navigate in an exp, Jay Walters | Date | RE: [xsl] Passing parameters to fun, Michael Kay |
Month |