Subject: [xsl] Fwd: [Schematron-love-in] Screamatron Torture Test From: Dave Pawson <daveP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 03:57:07 +0000 |
>Rick Jelliffe wrote: >I've put a page detailing the results of attempting to port >conformance1-5.xsl >(i.e. the new skeleton with the conformance language output) to about 10 >different >Wintel C and Java off-the-shelf XSLT processors. >http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron/1.5/conrep.html > >Executive Summary: we don't have a chance of getting anywhere until >the XSLT implementations are better. I pity the innocent programmer who >reads about Schematron and downloads it and tries to make it work. > >Recommended processors: SAXON first, with XT and Xalan4C also acceptable. > >I don't join in the XSLT maillists, but if anyone here does, perhaps you >could forward this to that group with the suggestion that >conformance1-5.xsl + skeleton1-5.xsl + schematron1-5.xml seem to make an >excellent torture test. > >Cheers >Rick Jelliffe XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] tool to create XSL, bryan . s . schnabel | Thread | Re: [xsl] Fwd: [Schematron-love-in], Uche Ogbuji |
[xsl] immediately preceding:: / fol, mjyoungblut | Date | RE: [xsl] Passing parameters to fun, Linda van den Brink |
Month |