Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:11:50 +0000 |
> as would a node equality predicate so you > > could test > > whether two nodes were equal (or one node was in a node set) without > > resorting to generate-id() or count(.|$ns) = count($ns). > > Less sure on this one, but I think you are almost confirming > the approach I suggested. Bring the common ones into mainstream XSL > and keep out scripting. > The XSLT 1.1 approach is to consider features that have been commonly implemented, but what I'd like to see for this would not be a legal implementer extension in 1.0: how about "==" for a "same-node" operator, complete with usual node-set comparison sematics? Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (node e, David Carlisle |
[xsl] Client side processing with S, Brand_Niemann | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, DPawson |
Month |