Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:06:36 -0800 |
| Grouping primitves would make all the difference, as would a | node equality predicate so you could test whether two nodes | were equal (or one node was in a node set) without | resorting to generate-id() or count(.|$ns) = count($ns). Some people are talking in this thread as if the introduction of <xsl:script> represents the last element ever *needed* in XSLT, since anyway you can just hack the rest of what you need in code. :-) That's not the point at all. Grouping primitives are being tackled for XSLT 2.0 based on a set of use cases culled from the XSL FAQ and ones submitted here on XSL-List (in addition to ones that the working group came up with). These use cases will be published as part of the XSLT 2.0 requirements document, when made publically available soon on the W3C site. ______________________________________________________________ Steve Muench, Lead XML Evangelist & Consulting Product Manager BC4J & XSQL Servlet Development Teams, Oracle Rep to XSL WG Author "Building Oracle XML Applications", O'Reilly http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/orxmlapp/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, David Carlisle | Thread | namespace for xxx:script (was: [xsl, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] A template selection for , Devlin, Kurt | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Scott_Boag |
Month |