Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:22:20 +0000 |
Scott_Boag@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > does this mean you would favour XSLT extensions in XSLT > >(<saxon:function> style) > > I don't know of anyone who's against this. It's a matter of getting the > design right... there are complications when you get into the details. I > would rather see this laid on top of XSLT 2.0, since I think there are type > system ramifications. > I don't know about the XSLT 2.0 type agenda - can you suggest any useful links? Can you be a bit more specific about which XSLT 2.0 style "type system ramifications" a <saxon:function> feature would raise that aren't already raised in <xsl:script>? Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Scott_Boag | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Michael Kay |
[xsl] need whitespace between attri, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] need whitespace between a, Jeni Tennison |
Month |