Subject: Re[2]: [xsl] CDATA back to its original shape From: viewga <viewga@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:20:54 +0200 |
Hello David, Thursday, February 15, 2001, 3:35:20 PM, you wrote: DC> You meant <!<[CDATA not <cdata there I think, but beware yes DC> But why would anyone want to write DC> <xsl:text disable-output-encoding="yes"><![CDATA[ <foo> </foo>]]></xsl:text> DC> which is a horrible kludge even when it works, when you can DC> far more simply write DC> <foo> </foo> because there can be a thing such as <xsl:text disable-output-encoding="yes"><![CDATA[<a><b><c>]]></xsl:text>, and there may be a lot of reasons for having <a><b><c> (i.e. not wellformed xml) - as for ex - header, body, footer - with header and footer formed by not well formed html (i.e. <html> in header and </html> in footer) or to speedup parsing or whatever the reason is. -- This reply is provided on AS IS basis without warranty of any kind -- Best regards, viewga mailto:viewga@xxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] CDATA back to its origina, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] CDATA back to its origina, David Carlisle |
[xsl] context, Jo Bourne | Date | [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-tem, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |