Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:05:49 GMT |
> Maybe one of this days you'll explain why this cannot be done with > XSLT 1.0. Maybe it could be with some extra agreed conventions external to XSL (which is I think what you are arguing for) but the current situation in XSLT 1.0 is th exsl:choose mess that I posted earlier. Where the implementation of the extension function is in a different namespace for each processor. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji |
Re: [xsl] XPath over DOM, David_N_Bertoni | Date | RE: [xsl] Converting &, >, <, ", an, Kevin Duffey |
Month |