Subject: Re: [xsl] CDATA back to its original shape From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:33:46 GMT |
> I'm not changing the programming language > just for one exception, don't you think? well firstly of course my wording was deliberately too strong. Things are never clearly good or bad when doing a real project. And anyway you are free to ignore any of my ramblings:-) But actually no, I agree that if you are outputting some non HTML non XML then this is probably exactly the sort of place that disable-output-encoding might have a place. What I was refering to was the practice of trying to output "</tr><tr>" in non well formed chunks by using disable-output-encoding. rather than doing it the "XSLT way" of selecting the nodes that you need for each row and processing each row inside a well formed <tr> ...</tr> literal result element. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] CDATA back to its origina, Ruben Inoto | Thread | Re: [xsl] CDATA back to its origina, Scott_Boag |
RE: [xsl] Converting &, >, <, ", an, Clapham, Paul | Date | RE: [xsl] Building an index in XSL, Michael Kay |
Month |