Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:include still a problem.. From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:48:44 +0100 |
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:23:23AM -0000, Michael Kay wrote: > > What does 'including an absolute xml:base' look like please anyone? > > >From the xml:base rec (PR 20 Dec 2000): > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <doc xml:base="http://example.org/today/"> > ... > </doc> Just for the reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/ Note that: - XSLT-1.0 processors are not supposed to recognize xml:base - XSLT-1.1 processors are (or more precisely "will be") expected to recognize it Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl:include still a probl, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl:include still a probl, DPawson |
RE: [xsl] xsl:script and side-effec, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments -Exampl, David Carlisle |
Month |