|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Reliance on import precedence considered dangerous From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:08:55 GMT |
> (on both it's factual or it's status as a known
> problem that David first identified 18 months ago).
Funny you should mention that. This bit us (on a real project)
some time back while working on a stylesheet that was xsl:importing a
much hacked version of Norm's docbook styles.
> In honour of David Carlisle's penchant for OP
Not really that fond of it ('twas Jiri Jirat that started that
particular thread)
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Reliance on import precedence, Jeni Tennison | Thread | [xsl] XSLT 2.0 Requirements - Regul, Dylan Walsh |
| RE: [xsl] xsl:include still a probl, DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton |
| Month |