Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments

> Agreed. Anyone interested in doing a "lint" style transform for checking
> transform portability?

Is there really anything other than don't use extension functions and
try not to use disable-output-encoding?

David


_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, (continued) Jeni Tennison - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:41:25 +0000 Uche Ogbuji - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:06:37 -0700 Joshua Allen - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:42:56 -0800 Francis Norton - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:16:57 +0000 David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:47:31 GMT <= Francis Norton - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:39:25 +0000 Tobias Reif - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:08:45 -0800 (PST) David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:29:41 GMT Tobias Reif - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:39:11 -0800 (PST)

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, (continued)
- Joshua Allen - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:42:56 -0800
  - Francis Norton - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:16:57 +0000
    - David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:47:31 GMT <=
    - Francis Norton - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:39:25 +0000
    - Tobias Reif - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:08:45 -0800 (PST)
    - David Carlisle - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:29:41 GMT
    - Tobias Reif - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:39:11 -0800 (PST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton
[xsl] news, Tobias Reif	Date	Re: [xsl] W3 XSLT 2.0 Requirements , Francis Norton
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home