Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:13:11 +0000 |
David Carlisle wrote: > <snip good explanation> > > There is no way for a named template to emulate copy-of which is one > reeasons why viewing XSLT functions as syntaxtic sugar for named > templates may not be quite the right thing and you need something like > saxon:return. > Thank you - I *was* being lazy! Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] xsl:include still a probl, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Jeni Tennison |
Month |