Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments -Examples please From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:38:59 -0700 |
> Not a straw man at all. Look at stylesheets like Norm Walsh's docbook > stylesheets or Sebastian's TEI ones that try to be portable. They have > _lots_ of this kind of rubbish or equally horrible multiple nested > xsl:fallbacks for each of the known processors. Oh boy. I'm not very familiar with either (we use our own lightweight docbook stylesheet with nary an extension function). I guess some good comes of it: I have a handy place to start in finding common extension functions to catalog. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments -Exampl, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments -Exampl, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: RE: syntax sugar for call, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |