Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (portability)

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments (portability)
From: Joe English <jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:57:09 -0800
David Carlisle  wrote:

> which relates to a question I was going to ask about what do people mean
> by a portable stylesheet.
> One that doesn't use features of XSLT declared to be system independent
> or
> One that works uniformly on the XSL engines you have available.

Following C terminology, I usually use "portable" to mean the second
and "strictly conforming" to mean the first.

--Joe English


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread