Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-process 1.2 available From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 09:29:01 -0000 |
> I don't use xsl:document (I reverted back to 6.0.2 and saxon:output), > because I cannot see any way to write a stylesheet using it that any > other processor today will accept. Is there a way? If you write <some-outer-lre xsl:version="1.1"> <xsl:document ...> <xsl:fallback>...</xsl:fallback> </xsl:document> </some-outer-lre> Then a 1.0 processor should ignore it, just as it ignores an extension element. I agree the need for an enclosing literal result element to hold the xsl:version attribute is a pain, and I've never understood why it's needed. But if there are problems with this it sounds as if there is a valid reason for reintroducing saxon:output (or saxon:document) as a synonym, in the same way as I did with xsl:script. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-proce, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-proce, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Transforming HTML to NITF, Michael Kay |
Month |