Subject: RE: [xsl] Not So Newbie XPath Question From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:35:00 -0000 |
> Is the following the most reasonable way to do it? > > z/*[preceding-sibling::a and not(self::a)][position() = 1] > > I have tested it and it seems to be ok. It looks OK to me. An alternative is z/a/following-sibling::*[not(self::a)][1] Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Not So Newbie XPath Quest, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] Not So Newbie XPath Quest, DPawson |
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] Keyword xsl:number may no, Michael Kay |
Month |