Subject: [xsl] Common Extension Process (was: Re: Designs for XSLT functions) From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:48:14 -0700 |
> > I hope that I and my fellow implementors who are interested > > in these ideas can > > all agree on a single NSRef for this set of extensions. I have the > > opentechnology.org domain available. If this is amenable, how about > > > > xmlns.opentechnology.org/common-xslt-extensions > > How about xmlns.opentechnology.org/xslt-extensions/common > to allow other groups such as /sql, /grouping, etc? OK. > But the namespace isn't important, it's the process for deciding how things > get into it. Agreed. > The process can be very lightweight, but it needs to exist. My > preferred option would be to have the decision controlled by a > vendor-neutral referee whom everyone trusts. Any volunteers, Jeni? Agreed, and Jeni would be a slam-dunk IMO if she volunteers. If we decide to start such discussion, do we do so on this list, or do we want to branch into an XSLT-DEV list? If the latter, I suggest Sourceforge, or I could host the list (but I don't want to seem like I'm trying to take things over). If we stay on this list, we should probably tag the posts with [EXT-DEV] or something like that so we can be distinguished from the "how do I group while I sort" question of the day. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Steve Muench |
Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Uche Ogbuji | Date | Re: [xsl] line numbering, Ruben Inoto |
Month |