Subject: RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar f or call-template) From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:28:01 -0000 |
> From: Jeni Tennison > I must admit to being completely confused by XQuery. It seems like > reinventing XSLT but without XML syntax for programming constructs > (admittedly a fair step to take). I thought that it might be that > XQueries are for building XML from things other than XML, but the > XPath-like syntax seems to imply that the source (e.g. database) is > accessed as a node tree anyway. I feel sure that I must be missing > something. The url I posted is for the 'English' / human version. The XML version is yet to come, hopefully with aligned syntax. Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xsl:with-param?, Jo Kong HO | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Designs for XSLT func, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: Designs for XSLT func, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |