|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:45:31 -0700 |
> OK, > But the following is allowed, isn't it? > > x:fn(QName, "Name1 Value1",..., "NameN ValueN") > > Variations of this allow for passing by name -- only, > passing by position only, or a mixture of passing by name > and passing by position. I find the above a tad sloppy from a lexical point of view. I still prefer the subsequent parameter approach. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Re: Designs for XSLT func, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Designs for XSLT func, Michael Kay |
| RE: [xsl] side effect definition, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, David . Rosenborg |
| Month |