|
Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:12:02 -0700 |
> Hi Jeni, > > > I think the upshot of this is that unless we introduce a proper > > construct like (test ? true : false) that only evaluates the relevant > > expression, we *have* to enable xsl:if/xsl:choose to be specified > > within function declarations. An exsl:if() function will not be > > sufficient. > > That's correct. Well, I definitely think an exsl:ternary() extension function should be on our list to consider. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Michael Kay |
| RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Mulberry Technologie | Date | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Jeni Tennison |
| Month |