Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)

Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:18:12 -0700
> > I'd say "scary thought: no", but how to best restrict this?
> > Structurally? ("Every exsl:function must have an exsl:result within
> > the nodes in its descendant axis").
> 
> There's a good point there about what to do if no exsl:result element
> is instantiated.  Returning an empty node set would at least stop
> function calls from breaking if the result of the function was used as
> a node set.  Or should it be an unrecoverable error if no exsl:result
> is instantiated?

I don't mind saxon:functions's answer to this: the result is an empty string 
in the absence of exsl:result

-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread