Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugarfor call-template) From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:13:34 +0000 |
> >From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Well, you can in Saxon 6.2 (which includes 1.1 support, though this > >> shouldn't apply given the version="1.0") but not in MSXML3 > > > >According to the XSLT 1.1 working draft, a conformant XSLT 1.1 processor > >treats stylesheets in the same way whether they specify version="1.0" or > >version="1.1": it is not expected to know which features were introduced in > >which release. > > Well, yes I can see that it could get a bit complicated if each later version was expected to emulate every earlier version. That'll teach me to pay more attention to specifics. There it is in XSLT 1.1 Requirements - but I only remembered the gist of it, not the "in error" exclusion: "Any stylesheet whose behaviour is fully specified in version 1.0, and which is not in error under version 1.0, MUST behave the same way under version 1.1." Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Mulberry Technologie | Thread | RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Michael Kay |
Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT , Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] [ANN] XSLT tutorial, Henning Behme |
Month |