Subject: Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call for comments From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:11:45 +0000 |
Could someone forward this to Xalan-Dev and to anywhere else that you think might be interested? Thanks, Jeni ---- > Hi, > > I've put together a draft document that summarises our recent > discussions on user-defined extension functions written in XSLT at: > > http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/exsl.html > > Comments on it should be sent here, to XSL-List with [exsl] at the > start of the subject line. > > The main part of the document specifies the extension elements and > functions (viz exsl:function, exsl:return and exsl:node-set()) that > we've been talking about. Several outstanding issues are highlighted, > but comments on other areas are welcome. It would be particularly > helpful to hear from implementers. > > Appendix B gives loads of use cases of functions that could be > implemented under this scheme, many of them borrowed from Saxon, which > demonstrate the strengths (and weaknesses) of the scheme described in > the document. If you have more use cases, then please let us know > about them and, preferably, their solution. > > I'm not sure how long would be an adequate review period - one week? > two? longer? Maybe it's best to wait and see how much discussion there > is. > > Cheers, > > Jeni > --- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/ > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call f, Miloslav Nic | Thread | Re: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call f, Dave Hartnoll |
Re: [xsl] Concat ( Again ), Samuzeau Pascal | Date | Re: [xsl] Concat ( Again ), Eric van der Vlist |
Month |