Subject: [xsl] Re: FXPath - A comment on EXSL From: "David Rosenborg" <david.rosenborg@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:53:30 +0100 |
Hi Jeni, > After wracking my brains all night (see what I mean about life and > XML?) I thought of one! :) Oh, sorry for keeping you up :-) > > if and then * else - 2 > > Could be: > > if (and) then (*) else (- 2) > > or: > > (if) and (then) * (else - 2) As the FXPath grammar is written, IfExpr has higher precedence than AndExpr so it will be parsed as if (and) then (*) else (- 2) Just as: or and and or and or or and or Is parsed as: ((or) and (and)) or ((and) or ((or) and (or))) And not: (or) and (((and) or ((and) or (or))) and (or)) Cheers, </David> David Rosenborg Pantor Engineering AB XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: FXPath - A comment on EXS, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: FXPath - A comment on, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] XPath for all of an eleme, Michael Strasser | Date | Re: [xsl] conditional include and p, David Carlisle |
Month |