Subject: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1 From: cutlass <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 20:27:36 +0000 |
the proof of this will be which xslt parser will become dominant. a wild variant may be more successful even if it is 'out of spec', due to it being free, representing the mass's user requirements etc.To come back to to XSLT embedding XSLT within a general purpose language would be as bad an idea as embedding the general language within XSLT (i.e. xsl:script) and IMHO, the clean way to do it is rather through the usage of the function call (or corresponding feature) of each language.
Eric
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Clark C. Evans | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Eric van der Vlist |
Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Clark C. Evans | Date | [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicle fo, Clark C. Evans |
Month |