Re: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicle for XSLT extensions?

[Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 11:19 AM +0700 3/4/01, James Clark wrote:

> There is also a precedent for this in XSLT 1.0: the result-prefix and
> stylesheet-prefix attributes on xsl:namespace-alias and the
> extension-element-prefixes attribute on xsl:stylesheet are using
> prefixes to refer to namespaces in exactly the same way.  In these
> cases, as with implements-prefix (and as with element and attribute
> QNames), the prefix has no function other than to serve as a place
> holder for the namespace URI.

I see the point you're making here, but I don't think it's strong 
enough to justify implements-prefix="d" instead of 
implements="http://www.somehwere.com"; on xsl:script. The cases you 
mention have always confused me precisely because they're using 
prefixes where you'd naturally expect them to be using URIs. That 
mistake may not be fixable at this point, but let's not propagate it 
into new elements. If you need to associate something with a 
namespace, you should use the URI, not the prefix.
--

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|                  The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999)                   |
|              http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/               |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list